CPU
GPU
Arc A770
Popular choices:
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A770
Performance Per Dollar RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A770 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc A770 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Alchemist / 6nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (280mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770 and RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Arc A770
The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,508 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A770 scores 13,332 and the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 13,508 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 12,800 (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2025 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770) vs 100 (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 512 Tensor cores vs 400.
| Feature | Arc A770 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,332 | 13,508+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 12800+213% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.66 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+232% |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+19% | 2025 MHz |
| ROPs | 128 | 176+38% |
| TMUs | 256 | 400+56% |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB | 72 MB+350% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 100+213% |
| Tensor Cores | 512+28% | 400 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A770 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A770 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has 6 GB. The Arc A770 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 72 MB (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A770 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+167% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB | 72 MB+350% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A770 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | Arc A770 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 35W — a 146.2% difference. The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 500W (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 280mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | Arc A770 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 35W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 280mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 59.3 | 385.9+551% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc A770 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $280 | — |
| Codename | DG2-512 | AD102 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #191 | #16 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A770 and RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
