CPU
GPU
Arc A770
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A770
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 101.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A770 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-101.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+101.9%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Alchemist / 6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (280mm) | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $550 (vs $280), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 2.8% better value per dollar than the Arc A770.
| Insight | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($280) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770 and GeForce RTX 4070
Arc A770
The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A770 scores 13,332 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 101.9%. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 512 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,332 | 26,919+102% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 5888+44% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.66 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2475 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+39% | 184 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB | 36 MB+125% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 46+44% |
| Tensor Cores | 512+178% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A770 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A770 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The Arc A770 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 1.6% advantage for the Arc A770. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+2% | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB | 36 MB+125% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 280mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 200W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 280mm | 304mm |
| Height | — | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 59.3 | 134.6+127% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A770 launched at $349 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 and now averages $550. The Arc A770 costs 49.1% less ($270 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 47.6 (Arc A770) vs 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 2.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-42% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $280-49% | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.6 | 48.9+3% |
| Codename | DG2-512 | AD104 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #191 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A770 and GeForce RTX 4070
