Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs A10G
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Popular choices:
A10G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Performance Per Dollar A10G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The A10G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (24 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro Vega 64X.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) (14nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | Standard Buffer (0 MB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The A10G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $2,000 versus $2,200 for the Radeon Pro Vega 64X, it costs 9% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 11.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+11.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,200) | ✅More affordable ($2,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 64X and A10G
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 13,369 and the A10G reaches 13,598 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is built on GCN 5.0 while the A10G uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 9,216 (A10G). Raw compute: 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1710 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,369 | 13,598+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 9216+125% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.03 TFLOPS | 31.52 TFLOPS+162% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1710 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 256 | 288+13% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 9 MB+800% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the A10G has 24 GB. The A10G offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 6 MB (A10G) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 12 Ultimate (A10G). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs NVENC 7th Gen (A10G). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X draws 250W versus the A10G's 150W — a 50% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 500W (A10G). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs Unknown.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 150W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | Unknown-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5 | 90.7+70% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200 MSRP and currently averages $2200, while the A10G launched at $2500 and now averages $2000. The A10G costs 9.1% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 6.8 (A10G) — the A10G offers 11.5% better value. The A10G is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2200-12% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2200 | $2000-9% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 6.8+11% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GA102 |
| Release | March 19 2019 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #190 | #182 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro Vega 64X and A10G
