Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) (14nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | Standard Buffer (0 MB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (280mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $2,200 versus $3,499 for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot, it costs 37% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 61.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+61.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($2,200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,499) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 64X and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 13,369 and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 13,182 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1967 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,369+1% | 13,182 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+7% | 3840 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.03 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+26% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1967 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 256+7% | 240 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X draws 250W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 280mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-38% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 280mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5+62% | 33.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200 MSRP and currently averages $2200, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499 and now averages $3499. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X costs 37.1% less ($1299 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64X offers 60.5% better value. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2200-37% | $3499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2200-37% | $3499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1+61% | 3.8 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 21 |
| Release | March 19 2019 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #190 | #157 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro Vega 64X and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
