Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Radeon RX Vega 56

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

2019Core: 1250 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega 56

2017Core: 1156 MHzBoost: 1471 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Radeon RX Vega 56 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Radeon RX Vega 56 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Radeon RX Vega 56: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

2019

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 56 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 451.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,200 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 32.6 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Radeon RX Vega 56

2017

Why buy it

  • 17.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $1,801 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
  • Delivers 437.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.6 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon Pro Vega 64X is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon RX Vega 56 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro Vega 64X instead at 13,369 vs 13,026, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX Vega 56 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,801 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $2,200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 437.2% (32.6 vs 6.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Radeon RX Vega 56 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 56

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1156 MHz to 1471 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,026 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 13,369 and the Radeon RX Vega 56 reaches 13,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 3,584 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Raw compute: 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 10.54 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 56). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1471 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64XRadeon RX Vega 56
G3D Mark Score
13,369+3%
13,026
Architecture
GCN 5.0
GCN 5.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
4096+14%
3584
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.03 TFLOPS+14%
10.54 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
1471 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
256+14%
224
L1 Cache
1 MB+14%
0.88 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64XRadeon RX Vega 56
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX Vega 56 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 64X and 2048-bit on the Radeon RX Vega 56.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64XRadeon RX Vega 56
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
HBM2
Bus Width
128-bit
2048-bit+1500%
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64XRadeon RX Vega 56
DirectX
12.1
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 56).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64XRadeon RX Vega 56
Encoder
VCE 4.0
VCE 4.0
Decoder
UVD 7.0
UVD 7.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X draws 250W versus the Radeon RX Vega 56's 210W — a 17.4% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 56 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 650W (Radeon RX Vega 56). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 280mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64XRadeon RX Vega 56
TDP
250W
210W-16%
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
650W
Power Connector
Integrated
2x 8-pin
Length
0mm
280mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
75-12%
Perf/Watt
53.5
62.0+16%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro Vega 64X came in at $2200, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 launched at $399. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega 56 was 81.9% cheaper ($1801 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 32.6 (Radeon RX Vega 56) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 offers 434.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro Vega 64X (2019 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64XRadeon RX Vega 56
MSRP
$2200
$399-82%
Performance per Dollar
6.1
32.6+434%
Codename
Vega 10
Vega 10
Release
March 19 2019
August 14 2017
Ranking
#190
#199

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.