
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 56
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 56 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌451.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,200 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 32.6 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Radeon RX Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅18.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,801 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 437.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.6 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 64X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019Radeon RX Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅18.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,801 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 437.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.6 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 64X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 56 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌451.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,200 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 32.6 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro Vega 64X better than Radeon RX Vega 56?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX Vega 56 make more sense than Radeon Pro Vega 64X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 526 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 413 FPS | 440 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 220 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 64X and Radeon RX Vega 56

Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.

Radeon RX Vega 56
Radeon RX Vega 56
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1156 MHz to 1471 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,026 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 13,369 and the Radeon RX Vega 56 reaches 13,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 3,584 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Raw compute: 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 10.54 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 56). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1471 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,369+3% | 13,026 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+14% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.03 TFLOPS+14% | 10.54 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1471 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+14% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+14% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX Vega 56 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 2048-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 2048-bit+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 56).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X draws 250W versus the Radeon RX Vega 56's 210W — a 17.4% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 56 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 650W (Radeon RX Vega 56). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 280mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 210W-16% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 280mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5 | 62.0+16% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 launched at $399. The Radeon RX Vega 56 costs 81.9% less ($1801 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 32.6 (Radeon RX Vega 56) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 offers 434.4% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2200 | $399-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 32.6+434% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Vega 10 |
| Release | March 19 2019 | August 14 2017 |
| Ranking | #190 | #199 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













