Radeon PRO W6300 vs FirePro D300
Radeon PRO W6300
Popular choices:
FirePro D300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon PRO W6300 is positioned at rank 51 and the FirePro D300 is on rank 130, so the Radeon PRO W6300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6300
Performance Per Dollar FirePro D300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon PRO W6300 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The Radeon PRO W6300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro D300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro D300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W6300.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6300 | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro D300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $150 for the Radeon PRO W6300, it costs 87% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 671.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6300 | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+671.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6300 and FirePro D300
Radeon PRO W6300
The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.
FirePro D300
The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6300 scores 5,560 and the FirePro D300 reaches 5,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the FirePro D300 uses GCN 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 1,280 (FirePro D300). Raw compute: 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,560 | 5,722+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1280+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.133 TFLOPS+44% | 2.176 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 80+67% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 320 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6300 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro D300 has 4 GB. The FirePro D300 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro D300) — the Radeon PRO W6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6300 draws 25W versus the FirePro D300's 150W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 350W (FirePro D300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-83% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 222.4+484% | 38.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the FirePro D300 launched at $500 and now averages $20. The FirePro D300 costs 86.7% less ($130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.1 (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 286.1 (FirePro D300) — the FirePro D300 offers 671.2% better value. The Radeon PRO W6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-60% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $20-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.1 | 286.1+671% |
| Codename | Navi 24 | Pitcairn |
| Release | January 19 2022 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #413 | #506 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W6300 and FirePro D300
