CPU
GPU
Radeon PRO W6300
Popular choices:
Radeon TM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon PRO W6300 is positioned at rank 51 and the Radeon TM is on rank 55, so the Radeon PRO W6300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6300
Performance Per Dollar Radeon TM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon TM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W6300.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon TM remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6300 and Radeon TM
Radeon PRO W6300
The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.
Radeon TM
The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6300 scores 5,560 and the Radeon TM reaches 5,564 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon TM uses RDNA 3.5, both on 6 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 1,024 (Radeon TM). Raw compute: 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM). Boost clocks: 2040 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 16 (Radeon TM).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,560 | 5,564 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1024+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.133 TFLOPS | 5.939 TFLOPS+90% |
| Boost Clock | 2040 MHz | 2900 MHz+42% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 64+33% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 12 | 16+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6300 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon TM has 4 GB. The Radeon TM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 2 MB (Radeon TM) — the Radeon TM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6300 draws 25W versus the Radeon TM's 15W — a 50% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 350W (Radeon TM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 15W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 222.4 | 370.9+67% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon TM is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | — |
| Codename | Navi 24 | Strix Point |
| Release | January 19 2022 | July 15 2024 |
| Ranking | #413 | #312 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W6300 and Radeon TM
