FirePro D300 vs Radeon PRO W6300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro D300 vs Radeon PRO W6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro D300 vs Radeon PRO W6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro D300

2014

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
150% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 27.8 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
❌500% higher power demand at 150W vs 25W.

Radeon PRO W6300

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 142.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 25W instead of 150W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro D300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (5,722 vs 5,560), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon PRO W6300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $300 cheaper on MSRP at $200 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 142.9% (27.8 vs 11.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. FirePro D300 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro D300 vs Radeon PRO W6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro D300

The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.

Radeon PRO W6300

The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro D300 scores 5,722 and the Radeon PRO W6300 reaches 5,560 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro D300 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon PRO W6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro D300) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6300). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300) vs 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300).

Feature	FirePro D300	Radeon PRO W6300
G3D Mark Score	5,722+3%	5,560
Architecture	GCN 1.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1280+67%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.176 TFLOPS	3.133 TFLOPS+44%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+67%	48
L1 Cache	320 KB+25%	256 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro D300	Radeon PRO W6300
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro D300 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6300 carries 2 GB. FirePro D300 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro D300 and 128-bit on the Radeon PRO W6300. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro D300) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) — the Radeon PRO W6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro D300	Radeon PRO W6300
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro D300 draws 150W versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 25W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D300) vs 350W (Radeon PRO W6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro D300	Radeon PRO W6300
TDP	150W	25W-83%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	38.1	222.4+484%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro D300 came in at $500, while the Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W6300 was 60% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.4 (FirePro D300) vs 27.8 (Radeon PRO W6300) — the Radeon PRO W6300 offers 143.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6300 (2022 vs 2014).

Feature	FirePro D300	Radeon PRO W6300
MSRP	$500	$200-60%
Performance per Dollar	11.4	27.8+144%
Codename	Pitcairn	Navi 24
Release	January 18 2014	January 19 2022
Ranking	#506	#413

Search FirePro D300 on Amazon

Search Radeon PRO W6300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.