Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon PRO W6300

AMD

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1250 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W6300

2022Core: 1512 MHzBoost: 2040 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • 240% higher power demand at 85W vs 25W.

Radeon PRO W6300

2022

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 25W instead of 85W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro 5300M better than Radeon PRO W6300?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,853 vs 5,560 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro 5300M is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W6300 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 6nm process instead of 7nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon PRO W6300 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $200 MSRP. Radeon Pro 5300M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon Pro 5300M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and you are getting 5.3% higher G3D Mark. Radeon PRO W6300 is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (25W vs 85W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon PRO W6300 make more sense than Radeon Pro 5300M?
Yes. Radeon PRO W6300 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (25W vs 85W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $200 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro 5300M. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro 5300M currently gives you 5.3% higher G3D Mark. Radeon PRO W6300 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon PRO W6300
1080p
low98 FPS126 FPS
medium85 FPS111 FPS
high67 FPS93 FPS
ultra40 FPS69 FPS
1440p
low88 FPS110 FPS
medium76 FPS92 FPS
high53 FPS75 FPS
ultra31 FPS56 FPS
4K
low28 FPS47 FPS
medium27 FPS43 FPS
high17 FPS31 FPS
ultra15 FPS28 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon PRO W6300
1080p
low125 FPS165 FPS
medium87 FPS131 FPS
high59 FPS97 FPS
ultra40 FPS65 FPS
1440p
low82 FPS107 FPS
medium49 FPS81 FPS
high36 FPS60 FPS
ultra26 FPS44 FPS
4K
low38 FPS55 FPS
medium25 FPS41 FPS
high20 FPS32 FPS
ultra14 FPS21 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon PRO W6300
1080p
low263 FPS250 FPS
medium211 FPS200 FPS
high176 FPS167 FPS
ultra132 FPS125 FPS
1440p
low198 FPS188 FPS
medium158 FPS150 FPS
high132 FPS125 FPS
ultra99 FPS94 FPS
4K
low132 FPS125 FPS
medium105 FPS100 FPS
high88 FPS83 FPS
ultra66 FPS63 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon PRO W6300
1080p
low141 FPS250 FPS
medium113 FPS200 FPS
high97 FPS167 FPS
ultra80 FPS125 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS188 FPS
medium85 FPS150 FPS
high73 FPS125 FPS
ultra59 FPS94 FPS
4K
low59 FPS109 FPS
medium47 FPS82 FPS
high38 FPS70 FPS
ultra29 FPS53 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5300M and Radeon PRO W6300

AMD

Radeon Pro 5300M

The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

AMD

Radeon PRO W6300

The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro 5300M scores 5,853 versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 5,560 — the Radeon Pro 5300M leads by 5.3%. The Radeon Pro 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon PRO W6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6300). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 2040 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon PRO W6300
G3D Mark Score
5,853+5%
5,560
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
7 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
1280+67%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.2 TFLOPS+2%
3.133 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
2040 MHz+63%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80+67%
48
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon PRO W6300
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 5300M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6300 has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro 5300M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) — the Radeon Pro 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon PRO W6300
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 5300M draws 85W versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 25W — a 109.1% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 350W (Radeon PRO W6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon PRO W6300
TDP
85W
25W-71%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
68.9
222.4+223%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon PRO W6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).

FeatureRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon PRO W6300
MSRP
$200
Codename
Navi 14
Navi 24
Release
November 13 2019
January 19 2022
Ranking
#403
#413