
Radeon Pro 5300M
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 5300M is positioned at rank 18 and the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is on rank 408, so the Radeon Pro 5300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5300M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 5300M uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro 5300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 5300M.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5300M and Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

Radeon Pro 5300M
The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5300M scores 5,853 and the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire uses GCN, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,853 | 6,000+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2560+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz+39% | 900 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit (Dual).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 512-bit (Dual)+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5300M draws 85W versus the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire's 200W — a 80.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-57% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 68.9+130% | 30.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5300M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $800 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $200 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Neptune CF |
| Release | November 13 2019 | March 1 2014 |
| Ranking | #403 | #348 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















