
Radeon Pro 5300M

Radeon R9 380
Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon R9 380 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon R9 380 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon R9 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro 5300M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Radeon R9 380 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon Pro 5300M is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 220W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 380 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon R9 380
2015Why buy it
- ✅21.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌158.8% higher power demand at 220W vs 85W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon R9 380 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 5300M
The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

Radeon R9 380
The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5300M scores 5,853 and the Radeon R9 380 reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon R9 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 380). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 970 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,853 | 6,000+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1792+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.2 TFLOPS | 3.476 TFLOPS+9% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz+29% | 970 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5300M and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 380. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 380) — the Radeon Pro 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon R9 380).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | — |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | — |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5300M draws 85W versus the Radeon R9 380's 220W — a 88.5% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-61% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 68.9+152% | 27.3 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5300M (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $199 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Antigua |
| Release | November 13 2019 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #403 | #396 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















