Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon R9 380

AMD

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1250 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 380

2015Boost: 970 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon R9 380 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon R9 380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon R9 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019

Why buy it

  • Radeon R9 380 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon Pro 5300M is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 85W instead of 220W, a 135W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 380 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon R9 380

2015

Why buy it

  • 21.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 158.8% higher power demand at 220W vs 85W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 380 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (6,000 vs 5,853), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro 5300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 380 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 380 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 5300M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon R9 380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro 5300M

The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 380

The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 5300M scores 5,853 and the Radeon R9 380 reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon R9 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 380). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 970 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon R9 380
G3D Mark Score
5,853
6,000+3%
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
7 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
1792+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.2 TFLOPS
3.476 TFLOPS+9%
Boost Clock
1250 MHz+29%
970 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
112+40%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon R9 380
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5300M and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 380. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 380) — the Radeon Pro 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon R9 380
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon R9 380).

FeatureRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon R9 380
Encoder
VCN 2.0
Decoder
VCN 2.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 5300M draws 85W versus the Radeon R9 380's 220W — a 88.5% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon R9 380
TDP
85W-61%
220W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
68.9+152%
27.3
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5300M (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon R9 380
MSRP
$199
Codename
Navi 14
Antigua
Release
November 13 2019
June 18 2015
Ranking
#403
#396

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.