
Radeon Pro 5300M
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 5300M is positioned at rank 18 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is on rank 369, so the Radeon Pro 5300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5300M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 5300M.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5300M and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

Radeon Pro 5300M
The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5300M scores 5,853 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS reaches 6,012 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 2100 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,853 | 6,012+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.2 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS+169% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 2100 MHz+68% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5300M draws 85W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS's 100W — a 16.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-15% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 68.9+15% | 60.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $600 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $600 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Navi 23 |
| Release | November 13 2019 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #403 | #135 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.


















