Radeon Pro 5300M vs RTX A400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 5300M vs RTX A400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 5300M vs RTX A400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019

Why buy it

✅49.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
❌70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.

RTX A400

2024

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5300M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 5300M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 49.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX A400 instead at 5,983 vs 5,853, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX A400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon Pro 5300M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon Pro 5300M vs RTX A400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 5300M

The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

RTX A400

The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 5300M scores 5,853 and the RTX A400 reaches 5,983 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1762 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300M	RTX A400
G3D Mark Score	5,853	5,983+2%
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Ampere
Process Node	7 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1280+67%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.2 TFLOPS+18%	2.706 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1250 MHz	1762 MHz+41%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+233%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 5300M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300M	RTX A400
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5300M and 128-bit on the RTX A400.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300M	RTX A400
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 5300M draws 85W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 51.9% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300M	RTX A400
TDP	85W	50W-41%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	68.9	119.7+74%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX A400 (2024 vs 2019).

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300M	RTX A400
MSRP	—	$135
Codename	Navi 14	GA107
Release	November 13 2019	April 16 2024
Ranking	#403	#397

Search Radeon Pro 5300M on Amazon

Search RTX A400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.