Radeon PRO W6300 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon PRO W6300 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon PRO W6300 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon PRO W6300

2022

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 25W instead of 190W, a 165W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 285 / 380 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌
0.5% HIGHER MSRP
$200 MSRPvs$199 MSRP

Radeon R9 285 / 380

2014

Why buy it

✅18.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌660% higher power demand at 190W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 285 / 380 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon PRO W6300 instead at 5,560 vs 5,550, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 285 / 380 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.3% (27.9 vs 27.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 285 / 380 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon PRO W6300 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon PRO W6300 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W6300

The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.

Radeon R9 285 / 380

The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W6300 scores 5,560 and the Radeon R9 285 / 380 reaches 5,550 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Raw compute: 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285 / 380).

Feature	Radeon PRO W6300	Radeon R9 285 / 380
G3D Mark Score	5,560	5,550
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	6 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	1792+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.133 TFLOPS	3.29 TFLOPS+5%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	112+133%
L1 Cache	256 KB	448 KB+75%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon PRO W6300	Radeon R9 285 / 380
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon PRO W6300 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285 / 380. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the Radeon PRO W6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6300	Radeon R9 285 / 380
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W6300 draws 25W versus the Radeon R9 285 / 380's 190W — a 153.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6300	Radeon R9 285 / 380
TDP	25W-87%	190W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	—	221mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	222.4+662%	29.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon PRO W6300 came in at $200, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon R9 285 / 380 was 0.5% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 27.8 (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the Radeon R9 285 / 380 offers 0.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6300 (2022 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon PRO W6300	Radeon R9 285 / 380
MSRP	$200	$199
Performance per Dollar	27.8	27.9
Codename	Navi 24	Tonga
Release	January 19 2022	September 2 2014
Ranking	#413	#365

Search Radeon PRO W6300 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 285 / 380 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.