CPU
GPU
Radeon PRO W6300
Popular choices:
GRID P40-12Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon PRO W6300 is positioned at rank 51 and the GRID P40-12Q is on rank 351, so the Radeon PRO W6300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6300
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-12Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon PRO W6300 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The Radeon PRO W6300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P40-12Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID P40-12Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6300 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon PRO W6300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $5,699 for the GRID P40-12Q, it costs 97% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 3713% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6300 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3713%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,699) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6300 and GRID P40-12Q
Radeon PRO W6300
The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.
GRID P40-12Q
The GRID P40-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,540 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6300 scores 5,560 and the GRID P40-12Q reaches 5,540 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GRID P40-12Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-12Q). Raw compute: 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-12Q). Boost clocks: 2040 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,560 | 5,540 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.133 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+54% |
| Boost Clock | 2040 MHz+73% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 128+167% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6300 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P40-12Q has 4 GB. The GRID P40-12Q offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 2 MB (GRID P40-12Q) — the GRID P40-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6300 draws 25W versus the GRID P40-12Q's 225W — a 160% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 350W (GRID P40-12Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-89% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 222.4+804% | 24.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GRID P40-12Q launched at $5699 and now averages $5699. The Radeon PRO W6300 costs 97.4% less ($5549 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.1 (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 1.0 (GRID P40-12Q) — the Radeon PRO W6300 offers 3610% better value. The Radeon PRO W6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-96% | $5699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-97% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.1+3610% | 1.0 |
| Codename | Navi 24 | GM204 |
| Release | January 19 2022 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #413 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W6300 and GRID P40-12Q
