
Radeon PRO W6300
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 690
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon PRO W6300 is positioned at rank #51 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6300
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon PRO W6300 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2012). The Radeon PRO W6300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 690 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 690.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6300 | GeForce GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (279mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 690 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $45 versus $150 for the Radeon PRO W6300, it costs 70% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 231.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6300 | GeForce GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+231.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6300 and GeForce GTX 690

Radeon PRO W6300
The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.

GeForce GTX 690
The GeForce GTX 690 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 3 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 3072 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,536 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6300 scores 5,560 and the GeForce GTX 690 reaches 5,536 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 690 uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 3,072 (GeForce GTX 690). Raw compute: 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 3.13 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 690). Boost clocks: 2040 MHz vs 1019 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | GeForce GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,560 | 5,536 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 3072 ×2+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.133 TFLOPS | 3.13 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2040 MHz+100% | 1019 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 48 | 128 ×2+167% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | GeForce GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit x2. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 690) — the Radeon PRO W6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | GeForce GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit x2+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6300 draws 25W versus the GeForce GTX 690's 300W — a 169.2% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 650W (GeForce GTX 690). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | GeForce GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-92% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 279mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 222.4+1102% | 18.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 690 launched at $999 and now averages $45. The GeForce GTX 690 costs 70% less ($105 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.1 (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 123.0 (GeForce GTX 690) — the GeForce GTX 690 offers 231.5% better value. The Radeon PRO W6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | GeForce GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-80% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $45-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.1 | 123.0+232% |
| Codename | Navi 24 | GK104 |
| Release | January 19 2022 | May 3 2012 |
| Ranking | #413 | #414 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















