Radeon PRO W6300 vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Radeon PRO W6300
Popular choices:
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon PRO W6300 is positioned at rank #51 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6300
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6300 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon PRO W6300 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6300 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Radeon PRO W6300
The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6300 scores 5,560 and the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) uses Xe LPG, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Boost clocks: 2040 MHz vs 1950 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,560+1% | 5,500 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Xe LPG |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+19100% | 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2040 MHz+5% | 1950 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6300 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) has 4 GB. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6300 draws 25W versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)'s 15W — a 50% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 15W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 222.4 | 366.7+65% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) costs 100+% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.1 (Radeon PRO W6300) vs Infinity (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) — the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | Navi 24 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Release | January 19 2022 | December 14 2023 |
| Ranking | #413 | #495 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W6300 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
