Radeon PRO W6600M vs RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon PRO W6600M vs RTX A2000 Embedded GPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon PRO W6600M vs RTX A2000 Embedded GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅22.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌157.1% higher power demand at 90W vs 35W.

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 90W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon PRO W6600M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (11,407 vs 11,117), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6600M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 8nm, and 28 vs 20 ray-tracing units. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon PRO W6600M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Radeon PRO W6600M vs RTX A2000 Embedded GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W6600M

The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 607 MHz to 1177 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,117 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W6600M scores 11,407 and the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU reaches 11,117 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 6.026 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2034 MHz vs 1177 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 20 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 80.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6600M	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score	11,407+3%	11,117
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Ampere
Process Node	7 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1792	2560+43%
Compute (TFLOPS)	7.29 TFLOPS+21%	6.026 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2034 MHz+73%	1177 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	112+40%	80
L1 Cache	0.5 MB	2.5 MB+400%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	28+40%	20

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6600M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6600M	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6600M and 128-bit on the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6600M	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6600M	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.4+17%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	5+25%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU).

Feature	Radeon PRO W6600M	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Encoder	VCN 3.0	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	VCN 3.0	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W6600M draws 90W versus the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 88% difference. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 82mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6600M	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
TDP	90W	35W-61%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	82mm
Height	0mm	4mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	126.7	317.6+151%