
Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7500
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon PRO W7500 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The Radeon PRO W7500 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W7500.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7500 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $401 for the Radeon PRO W7500, it costs 80% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 409.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7500 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+409.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($401) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7500 and GeForce GTX 1070

Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

GeForce GTX 1070
The GeForce GTX 1070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,507 points. Launch price was $379.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7500 scores 13,298 and the GeForce GTX 1070 reaches 13,507 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7500 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 1070 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 1,920 (GeForce GTX 1070). Raw compute: 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 6.463 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1683 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,298 | 13,507+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 1920+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.19 TFLOPS+89% | 6.463 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1700 MHz+1% | 1683 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 120+7% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 720 KB+41% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1070).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 6th gen |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 3rd gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7500 draws 70W versus the GeForce GTX 1070's 150W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 216mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-53% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 216mm | 267mm |
| Height | 115mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 190.0+111% | 90.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429 MSRP and currently averages $401, while the GeForce GTX 1070 launched at $379 and now averages $80. The GeForce GTX 1070 costs 80% less ($321 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.2 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 168.8 (GeForce GTX 1070) — the GeForce GTX 1070 offers 408.4% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429 | $379-12% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $401 | $80-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.2 | 168.8+408% |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GP104 |
| Release | August 3 2023 | June 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #192 | #185 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















