Radeon PRO W7500 vs RTX A2000

CPU

GPU

Radeon PRO W7500

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1700 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

RTX A2000

2021Core: 562 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz

Similar parts

···

Buy on Amazon

Radeon PRO W7500 vs RTX A2000 Performance Spectrum

Radeon PRO W7500

8 GB 70

13,298

0.0%

Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

13,464

+1.2%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce RTX 3060 12GB

TITAN V

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon PRO W7500 vs RTX A2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon PRO W7500 vs RTX A2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon PRO W7500

2023

Why buy it

✅10.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌29.3% longer card at 216mm vs 167mm.

RTX A2000

2021

Why buy it

✅Measures 167mm instead of 216mm, a 49mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌
4.9% HIGHER MSRP
$450 MSRPvs$429 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon PRO W7500 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX A2000 instead at 13,464 vs 13,298, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W7500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 8nm, 28 vs 26 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon PRO W7500 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $21 cheaper on MSRP at $429 vs $450, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3.6% (31.0 vs 29.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon PRO W7500 vs RTX A2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W7500

The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

RTX A2000

The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W7500 scores 13,298 and the RTX A2000 reaches 13,464 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7500 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 26 (RTX A2000) vs 104.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	RTX A2000
G3D Mark Score	13,298	13,464+1%
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	Ampere
Process Node	6 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1792	3328+86%
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.19 TFLOPS+53%	7.987 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1700 MHz+42%	1200 MHz
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	112+8%	104
L1 Cache	0.5 MB	3.3 MB+560%
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%
Ray Tracing Cores	28+8%	26

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A2000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	RTX A2000
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W7500 and 128-bit on the RTX A2000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000) — the RTX A2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	RTX A2000
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	RTX A2000
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	RTX A2000
Encoder	VCN 4.0	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	VCN 4.0	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W7500 draws 70W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 0% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 216mm vs 167mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	RTX A2000
TDP	70W	70W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	216mm	167mm
Height	115mm	68mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	190.0	192.3+1%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon PRO W7500 came in at $429, while the RTX A2000 launched at $450. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W7500 was 4.7% cheaper ($21 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 29.9 (RTX A2000) — the Radeon PRO W7500 offers 3.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7500 (2023 vs 2021).

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	RTX A2000
MSRP	$429-5%	$450
Performance per Dollar	31.0+4%	29.9
Codename	Navi 33	GA106
Release	August 3 2023	August 10 2021
Ranking	#192	#186

Search Radeon PRO W7500 on Amazon

Search RTX A2000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.