G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon PRO W7500 vs Radeon RX 6800M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon PRO W7500 vs Radeon RX 6800M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon PRO W7500

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 39.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 22.2 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 70W instead of 145W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).

Radeon RX 6800M

2021

Why buy it

✅20.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌
39.6% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.2 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
❌107.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 6800M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon PRO W7500 instead at 13,298 vs 13,295, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6800M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon PRO W7500 has no comparable frame-generation support, and 40 vs 28 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon PRO W7500 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $170 cheaper on MSRP at $429 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 39.7% (31.0 vs 22.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Radeon PRO W7500 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 6800M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon PRO W7500 vs Radeon RX 6800M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W7500

The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

Radeon RX 6800M

The Radeon RX 6800M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2116 MHz to 2390 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 145W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,295 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W7500 scores 13,298 and the Radeon RX 6800M reaches 13,295 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7500 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 6800M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6800M). Raw compute: 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 12.24 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800M). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 2390 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6800M).

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon RX 6800M
G3D Mark Score	13,298	13,295
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1792	2560+43%
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.19 TFLOPS	12.24 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1700 MHz	2390 MHz+41%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	112	160+43%
L1 Cache	512 KB	512 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR 3 + AFMF
Ray Tracing Cores	28	40+43%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6800M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W7500 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon RX 6800M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon PRO W7500 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6800M carries 12 GB. Radeon RX 6800M gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W7500 and 192-bit on the Radeon RX 6800M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6800M) — the Radeon RX 6800M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon RX 6800M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	12 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+33%	192-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6800M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon RX 6800M
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6800M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800M).

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon RX 6800M
Encoder	VCN 4.0	VCN 3.0
Decoder	VCN 4.0	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W7500 draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 6800M's 145W — a 69.8% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6800M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon RX 6800M
TDP	70W-52%	145W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	216mm	—
Height	115mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	190.0+107%	91.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon PRO W7500 came in at $429, while the Radeon RX 6800M launched at $599. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W7500 was 28.4% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 22.2 (Radeon RX 6800M) — the Radeon PRO W7500 offers 39.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7500 (2023 vs 2021).

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon RX 6800M
MSRP	$429-28%	$599
Performance per Dollar	31.0+40%	22.2
Codename	Navi 33	Navi 22
Release	August 3 2023	May 31 2021
Ranking	#192	#193

Search Radeon PRO W7500 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 6800M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.