G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon PRO W7500 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon PRO W7500 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon PRO W7500

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,070 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 722.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 70W instead of 400W, a 330W reduction.
✅Measures 216mm instead of 280mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

2021

Why buy it

✅31.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌
715.6% HIGHER MSRP
$3,499 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
❌471.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 70W.
❌29.6% longer card at 280mm vs 216mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 31.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon PRO W7500 instead at 13,298 vs 13,182, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W7500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 7nm and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon PRO W7500 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,070 cheaper on MSRP at $429 vs $3,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 722.8% (31.0 vs 3.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon PRO W7500 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W7500

The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W7500 scores 13,298 and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 13,182 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7500 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1967 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 60 ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
G3D Mark Score	13,298	13,182
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1792	3840 ×2+114%
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.19 TFLOPS	15.11 TFLOPS ×2+24%
Boost Clock	1700 MHz	1967 MHz+16%
ROPs	64	96 ×2+50%
TMUs	112	240 ×2+114%
L1 Cache	512 KB	768 KB+50%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR upscaling + RSR
Ray Tracing Cores	28	60 ×2+114%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W7500 and 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	384-bit+50%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Encoder	VCN 4.0	VCN 4.0 (2x)
Decoder	VCN 4.0	VCN 4.0 (2x)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W7500 draws 70W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 140.4% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 216mm vs 280mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
TDP	70W-83%	400W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	216mm	280mm
Height	115mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	190.0+476%	33.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon PRO W7500 came in at $429, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W7500 was 87.7% cheaper ($3070 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the Radeon PRO W7500 offers 715.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7500 (2023 vs 2021).

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
MSRP	$429-88%	$3499
Performance per Dollar	31.0+716%	3.8
Codename	Navi 33	Navi 21
Release	August 3 2023	August 3 2021
Ranking	#192	#157

Search Radeon PRO W7500 on Amazon

Search Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.