G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon PRO W7500 vs Radeon RX 5600 XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon PRO W7500 vs Radeon RX 5600 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon PRO W7500

2023

Why buy it

✅32.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
✅Measures 216mm instead of 267mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌
53.8% HIGHER MSRP
$429 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 48.2 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).

Radeon RX 5600 XT

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Delivers 55.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.2 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
❌23.6% longer card at 267mm vs 216mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon PRO W7500 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 32.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 5600 XT instead at 13,453 vs 13,298, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W7500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 7nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 5600 XT makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $279 vs $429, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 55.6% (48.2 vs 31.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Radeon RX 5600 XT is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon PRO W7500 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon PRO W7500 vs Radeon RX 5600 XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W7500

The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

Radeon RX 5600 XT

The Radeon RX 5600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,453 points. Launch price was $279.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W7500 scores 13,298 and the Radeon RX 5600 XT reaches 13,453 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7500 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 5600 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Raw compute: 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 7.188 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1560 MHz.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon RX 5600 XT
G3D Mark Score	13,298	13,453+1%
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	6 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1792	2304+29%
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.19 TFLOPS+70%	7.188 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1700 MHz+9%	1560 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	112	144+29%
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5600 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W7500 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon RX 5600 XT
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon PRO W7500 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600 XT carries 6 GB. Radeon PRO W7500 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W7500 and 192-bit on the Radeon RX 5600 XT. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600 XT) — the Radeon RX 5600 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon RX 5600 XT
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+33%	6 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+33%	192-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon RX 5600 XT
DirectX	12.2+2%	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600 XT).

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon RX 5600 XT
Encoder	VCN 4.0	VCN 2.0
Decoder	VCN 4.0	VCN 2.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W7500 draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 5600 XT's 150W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 216mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon RX 5600 XT
TDP	70W-53%	150W
Recommended PSU	500W	450W-10%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	216mm	267mm
Height	115mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	190.0+112%	89.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon PRO W7500 came in at $429, while the Radeon RX 5600 XT launched at $279. On MSRP, Radeon RX 5600 XT was 35% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 48.2 (Radeon RX 5600 XT) — the Radeon RX 5600 XT offers 55.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7500 (2023 vs 2020).

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP	$429	$279-35%
Performance per Dollar	31.0	48.2+55%
Codename	Navi 33	Navi 10
Release	August 3 2023	January 21 2020
Ranking	#192	#187

Search Radeon PRO W7500 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 5600 XT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.