Radeon PRO W7600 vs GeForce RTX 4070
Radeon PRO W7600
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7600
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 63.7% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W7600.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-63.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+63.7%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 / 6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $550 versus $599 for the Radeon PRO W7600, it costs 8% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 78.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+78.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($599) | ✅More affordable ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7600 and GeForce RTX 4070
Radeon PRO W7600
The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon PRO W7600 scores 16,443 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 63.7%. The Radeon PRO W7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 2440 MHz vs 2475 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,443 | 26,919+64% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 5888+188% |
| Boost Clock | 2440 MHz | 2475 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 184+44% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7600 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 504 GB/s+125% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7600 draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 42.4% difference. The Radeon PRO W7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-35% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.5 | 134.6+6% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7600 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $599, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 and now averages $550. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 8.2% less ($49 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.5 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 77.8% better value.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $599 | $550-8% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.5 | 48.9+78% |
| Codename | Navi 33 | AD104 |
| Release | August 3 2023 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #123 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7600 and GeForce RTX 4070
