
Radeon PRO W7600 vs GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon PRO W7600
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7600
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 109% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+109%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-109%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 / 6nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $599 for the Radeon PRO W7600, it costs 87% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 282.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+282.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($599) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7600 and GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon PRO W7600
The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon PRO W7600 scores 16,443 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Radeon PRO W7600 leads by 109%. The Radeon PRO W7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2440 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,443+109% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+129% | 896 |
| Boost Clock | 2440 MHz+47% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+129% | 56 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Radeon PRO W7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7600. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+75% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7600 draws 130W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 53.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 240mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 75W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 300W-54% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 240mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 126.5+21% | 104.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7600 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $599, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 87.5% less ($524 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.5 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 281.5% better value. The Radeon PRO W7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $149-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $599 | $75-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.5 | 104.9+281% |
| Codename | Navi 33 | TU117 |
| Release | August 3 2023 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #123 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.










