Radeon PRO W7600
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon PRO W7600 vs GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

Radeon PRO W7600

2023Boost: 2440 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7600

#9
Intel Arc Pro B50
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
127%
#11
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $900|Avg: $300
121%
#16
Radeon PRO W7500
MSRP: $429|Avg: $401
113%
#18
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340
112%
#19
RTX A2000 12GB
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
111%
#20
Radeon Pro Vega 56
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
111%
#21
RTX A2000
MSRP: $450|Avg: $320
109%
#23
Intel Arc Pro B60
MSRP: $500|Avg: $450
101%
#24
Radeon PRO W7600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
100%
#25
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $625|Avg: $750
100%
#26
Radeon Pro Vega 48
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
91%
#27
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
MSRP: $500|Avg: $280
91%
#28
Quadro P5200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $240
85%
#29
Radeon PRO W7700
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
84%
#30
Radeon PRO W6600
MSRP: $649|Avg: $649
84%
#32
Radeon AI PRO R9700
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450
80%
#33
Radeon Pro Vega 64
MSRP: $599|Avg: $114
78%
#38
Radeon PRO W6600X
MSRP: $699|Avg: $699
68%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon PRO W7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 109% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

InsightRadeon PRO W7600GeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Leading raw performance (+109%)
Lower raw frame rates (-109%)
Longevity
🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 / 6nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $599 for the Radeon PRO W7600, it costs 87% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 282.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon PRO W7600GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+282.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($599)
More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7600 and GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

Radeon PRO W7600

The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon PRO W7600 scores 16,443 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Radeon PRO W7600 leads by 109%. The Radeon PRO W7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2440 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureRadeon PRO W7600GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
16,443+109%
7,869
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Turing
Process Node
6 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2048+129%
896
Boost Clock
2440 MHz+47%
1665 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
128+129%
56

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon PRO W7600GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon PRO W7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Radeon PRO W7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7600. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon PRO W7600GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s+75%
128 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon PRO W7600GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12.2+2%
12
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureRadeon PRO W7600GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
VCN 4.0
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
VCN 4.0
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W7600 draws 130W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 53.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 240mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

FeatureRadeon PRO W7600GeForce GTX 1650
TDP
130W
75W-42%
Recommended PSU
650W
300W-54%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
240mm
229mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
70°C-7%
Perf/Watt
126.5+21%
104.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon PRO W7600 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $599, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 87.5% less ($524 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.5 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 281.5% better value. The Radeon PRO W7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).

FeatureRadeon PRO W7600GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$599
$149-75%
Avg Price (30d)
$599
$75-87%
Performance per Dollar
27.5
104.9+281%
Codename
Navi 33
TU117
Release
August 3 2023
April 23 2019
Ranking
#123
#323