Radeon PRO W7600 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Radeon PRO W7600
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7600
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 92% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W7600.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-92%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+92%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 / 6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $590 versus $599 for the Radeon PRO W7600, it costs 2% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 95% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+95%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($599) | ✅More affordable ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7600 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Radeon PRO W7600
The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon PRO W7600 scores 16,443 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 92%. The Radeon PRO W7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 6 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 2440 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,443 | 31,578+92% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 7680+275% |
| Boost Clock | 2440 MHz | 2610 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 128 | 240+88% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7600 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 504 GB/s+125% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7600 draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 74.7% difference. The Radeon PRO W7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-54% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-7% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 126.5+14% | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7600 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $599, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 1.5% less ($9 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.5 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 94.5% better value.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-25% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $599 | $590-2% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.5 | 53.5+95% |
| Codename | Navi 33 | AD104 |
| Release | August 3 2023 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #123 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7600 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
