Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs T400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs T400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs T400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
121.7% HIGHER MSRP
$399 MSRPvs$180 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 20.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

T400

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $219 less on MSRP ($180 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 117.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.1 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Radeon Pro WX 4100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so T400 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (3,682 vs 3,609), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

T400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

T400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $219 cheaper on MSRP at $180 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 117.3% (20.1 vs 9.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro WX 4100 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs T400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.

T400

The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 scores 3,682 and the T400 reaches 3,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the T400 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400). Boost clocks: 1201 MHz vs 1425 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4100	T400
G3D Mark Score	3,682+2%	3,609
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Turing
Process Node	14 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1024+167%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.46 TFLOPS+125%	1.094 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1201 MHz	1425 MHz+19%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	64+167%	24
L1 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4100	T400
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4100 and 64-bit on the T400.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4100	T400
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 draws 50W versus the T400's 30W — a 50% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4100	T400
TDP	50W	30W-40%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	73.6	120.3+63%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 4100 came in at $399, while the T400 launched at $180. On MSRP, T400 was 54.9% cheaper ($219 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 20.1 (T400) — the T400 offers 118.5% better value. The newer card here is T400 (2021 vs 2016).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4100	T400
MSRP	$399	$180-55%
Performance per Dollar	9.2	20.1+118%
Codename	Baffin	TU117
Release	November 10 2016	May 6 2021
Ranking	#526	#532

Search Radeon Pro WX 4100 on Amazon

Search T400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.