Radeon R5 340 vs Radeon HD 4770
Radeon R5 340
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 4770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 340 is positioned at rank 136 and the Radeon HD 4770 is on rank 149, so the Radeon R5 340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 340
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4770
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R5 340 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2009). The Radeon R5 340 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4770 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 340 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4770.
| Insight | Radeon R5 340 | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 340 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 340 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $109), it costs 77% less, resulting in a 348.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R5 340 | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+348.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($109) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 340 and Radeon HD 4770
Radeon R5 340
The Radeon R5 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $79.
Radeon HD 4770
The Radeon HD 4770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 28 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 909 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 340 scores 935 and the Radeon HD 4770 reaches 909 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 340 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon HD 4770 uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R5 340) vs 640 (Radeon HD 4770). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 340) vs 0.96 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4770).
| Feature | Radeon R5 340 | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 935+3% | 909 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9085 TFLOPS | 0.96 TFLOPS+6% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 128 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 340 | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R5 340) vs 128 KB (Radeon HD 4770) — the Radeon R5 340 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R5 340 | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 340 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 4770's 80W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon R5 340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R5 340) vs 400W (Radeon HD 4770). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R5 340 | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-38% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-25% | 400W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 203mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 72°C |
| Perf/Watt | 18.7+64% | 11.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 340 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Radeon HD 4770 launched at $109 and now averages $109. The Radeon R5 340 costs 77.1% less ($84 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.4 (Radeon R5 340) vs 8.3 (Radeon HD 4770) — the Radeon R5 340 offers 350.6% better value. The Radeon R5 340 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon R5 340 | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-9% | $109 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-77% | $109 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4+351% | 8.3 |
| Codename | Lexa | RV740 |
| Release | April 20 2017 | April 28 2009 |
| Ranking | #773 | #908 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 340 and Radeon HD 4770
