Radeon R5 A240 vs Radeon R7 M360

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R5 A240 vs Radeon R7 M360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R5 A240 vs Radeon R7 M360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R5 A240

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
✅Delivers 18.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 80W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M360 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M360

2015

Why buy it

✅36.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
20% HIGHER MSRP
$120 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌166.7% higher power demand at 80W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 M360 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 36.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (585 vs 576), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R5 A240 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 A240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $120, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 18.2% (5.8 vs 4.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R7 M360 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R5 A240 vs Radeon R7 M360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R5 A240

The Radeon R5 A240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 576 points. Launch price was $69.

Radeon R7 M360

The Radeon R7 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 A240 scores 576 and the Radeon R7 M360 reaches 585 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 A240 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M360 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 A240) vs 768 (Radeon R7 M360). Raw compute: 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 A240) vs 1.613 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M360). Boost clocks: 780 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R5 A240	Radeon R7 M360
G3D Mark Score	576	585+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	320	768+140%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.448 TFLOPS	1.613 TFLOPS+260%
Boost Clock	780 MHz	1000 MHz+28%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	20	48+140%
L1 Cache	80 KB	192 KB+140%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R5 A240	Radeon R7 M360
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R5 A240 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M360 carries 4 GB. Radeon R7 M360 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R5 A240 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M360.

Feature	Radeon R5 A240	Radeon R7 M360
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 A240 draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 M360's 80W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon R5 A240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 A240) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M360). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon R5 A240	Radeon R7 M360
TDP	30W-63%	80W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Perf/Watt	19.2+163%	7.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R5 A240 came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 M360 launched at $120. On MSRP, Radeon R5 A240 was 16.7% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (Radeon R5 A240) vs 4.9 (Radeon R7 M360) — the Radeon R5 A240 offers 18.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M360 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon R5 A240	Radeon R7 M360
MSRP	$100-17%	$120
Performance per Dollar	5.8+18%	4.9
Codename	Oland	Tobago
Release	October 8 2013	June 18 2015
Ranking	#911	#576

Search Radeon R5 A240 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M360 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.