Radeon R7 340
VS
Quadro 2000

Radeon R7 340 vs Quadro 2000

AMD

Radeon R7 340

2015Boost: 975 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 2000

2010Core: 625 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 340 is positioned at rank 130 and the Quadro 2000 is on rank 314, so the Radeon R7 340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 340

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
748%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
718%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
710%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
709%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
707%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
703%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
695%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
692%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
686%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
684%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
675%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
674%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
662%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
661%
#85
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
97%
#86
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
94%
#115
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
825%
#130
Radeon R7 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
100%
#133
Radeon HD 6750
MSRP: $109|Avg: $109
99%
#135
Radeon R5 240
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
98%
#136
Radeon HD 8570
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#137
Radeon R5 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
97%
#139
GeForce GT 730
MSRP: $89|Avg: $45
95%
#140
Radeon HD 8400E
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
95%
#142
Radeon HD 8400
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
93%
#143
Radeon HD 5750
MSRP: $130|Avg: $25
93%
#145
Radeon HD 8330E
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000

#116
Radeon Pro SSG
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500
99%
#299
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9350%
#314
Quadro 2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
100%
#315
FirePro S7150
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459
99%
#317
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
97%
#318
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
97%
#319
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
96%
#320
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
96%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
96%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
94%
#323
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
90%
#324
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
90%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
88%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
87%
#327
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
87%
#328
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
87%
#329
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 340 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R7 340Quadro 2000
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 340 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 340 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $25), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 340Quadro 2000
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1.3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 340 and Quadro 2000

AMD

Radeon R7 340

The Radeon R7 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 960 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000

The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 340 scores 960 and the Quadro 2000 reaches 948 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 340 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro 2000 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 340) vs 192 (Quadro 2000). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 340) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000).

FeatureRadeon R7 340Quadro 2000
G3D Mark Score
960+1%
948
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1024+433%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.997 TFLOPS+316%
0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
64+100%
32
L1 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 340Quadro 2000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 340 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 has 1 GB. The Quadro 2000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R7 340) vs 256 KB (Quadro 2000) — the Radeon R7 340 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 340Quadro 2000
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 340 draws 100W versus the Quadro 2000's 62W — a 46.9% difference. The Quadro 2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 340) vs 350W (Quadro 2000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R7 340Quadro 2000
TDP
100W
62W-38%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
178mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
9.6
15.3+59%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 340 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Quadro 2000 launched at $599 and now averages $25. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 38.4 (Radeon R7 340) vs 37.9 (Quadro 2000) — the Radeon R7 340 offers 1.3% better value. The Radeon R7 340 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon R7 340Quadro 2000
MSRP
$99-83%
$599
Avg Price (30d)
$25
$25
Performance per Dollar
38.4+1%
37.9
Codename
Trinidad
GF106
Release
June 18 2015
December 24 2010
Ranking
#467
#902