Radeon R7 340
VS
Radeon HD 6670/7670

Radeon R7 340 vs Radeon HD 6670/7670

AMD

Radeon R7 340

2015Boost: 975 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6670/7670

2012Core: 600 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 340 is positioned at rank 130 and the Radeon HD 6670/7670 is on rank 374, so the Radeon R7 340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 340

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
748%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
718%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
710%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
709%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
707%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
703%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
695%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
692%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
686%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
684%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
675%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
674%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
662%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
661%
#85
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
97%
#86
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
94%
#115
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
825%
#130
Radeon R7 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
100%
#133
Radeon HD 6750
MSRP: $109|Avg: $109
99%
#135
Radeon R5 240
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
98%
#136
Radeon HD 8570
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#137
Radeon R5 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
97%
#139
GeForce GT 730
MSRP: $89|Avg: $45
95%
#140
Radeon HD 8400E
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
95%
#142
Radeon HD 8400
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
93%
#143
Radeon HD 5750
MSRP: $130|Avg: $25
93%
#145
Radeon HD 8330E
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6670/7670

#364
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1136%
#366
1029%
#367
1027%
#371
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
934%
#372
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
927%
#374
Radeon HD 6670/7670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
100%
#375
Radeon 620
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#376
Radeon R5 435
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
100%
#377
Radeon R9 M470X
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
97%
#379
Radeon R9 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#381
Radeon HD 7640G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
92%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
91%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
91%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
90%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 340 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6670/7670.

InsightRadeon R7 340Radeon HD 6670/7670
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 340 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 340 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $40), it costs 38% less, resulting in a 62.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 340Radeon HD 6670/7670
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+62.4%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($25)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 340 and Radeon HD 6670/7670

AMD

Radeon R7 340

The Radeon R7 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 960 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon HD 6670/7670

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 340 scores 960 and the Radeon HD 6670/7670 reaches 946 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 340 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 6670/7670 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 340) vs 480 (Radeon HD 6670/7670). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 340) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670/7670).

FeatureRadeon R7 340Radeon HD 6670/7670
G3D Mark Score
960+1%
946
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1024+113%
480
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.997 TFLOPS+247%
0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
64+167%
24
L1 Cache
256 KB+433%
48 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 340Radeon HD 6670/7670
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R7 340) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 6670/7670) — the Radeon R7 340 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 340Radeon HD 6670/7670
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 340 draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 6670/7670's 45W — a 75.9% difference. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 340) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6670/7670). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon R7 340Radeon HD 6670/7670
TDP
100W
45W-55%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
9.6
21.0+119%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 340 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Radeon HD 6670/7670 launched at $99 and now averages $40. The Radeon R7 340 costs 37.5% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 38.4 (Radeon R7 340) vs 23.6 (Radeon HD 6670/7670) — the Radeon R7 340 offers 62.7% better value. The Radeon R7 340 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon R7 340Radeon HD 6670/7670
MSRP
$99
$99
Avg Price (30d)
$25-38%
$40
Performance per Dollar
38.4+63%
23.6
Codename
Trinidad
Turks
Release
June 18 2015
January 5 2012
Ranking
#467
#870