Radeon R7 340 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 340 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 340 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 340

2015

Why buy it

✅2.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
102% HIGHER MSRP
$99 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 20.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Delivers 110.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.4 vs 9.7 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 340 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 340 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) instead at 1,000 vs 960, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 340 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 110.5% (20.4 vs 9.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 340 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R7 340 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 340

The Radeon R7 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 960 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 340 scores 960 and the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) reaches 1,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 340 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 340) vs 384 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)).

Feature	Radeon R7 340	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
G3D Mark Score	960	1,000+4%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024+167%	384
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 340	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 340 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).

Feature	Radeon R7 340	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 340 draws 100W versus the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s 30W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 340) vs 350W (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Power connectors: None vs None.

Feature	Radeon R7 340	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
TDP	100W	30W-70%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	None
Length	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	9.6	33.3+247%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 340 came in at $99, while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) was 50.5% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.7 (Radeon R7 340) vs 20.4 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) — the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers 110.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 340 (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon R7 340	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
MSRP	$99	$49-51%
Performance per Dollar	9.7	20.4+110%
Codename	Trinidad	Kaveri Spectre
Release	June 18 2015	January 14 2014
Ranking	#467	#865

Search Radeon R7 340 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.