Radeon R7 340 vs Radeon R9 M375

AMD

Radeon R7 340

2015Boost: 975 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M375

2015Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1015 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R7 340 vs Radeon R9 M375 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 340 vs Radeon R9 M375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 340 vs Radeon R9 M375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 340

2015

Why buy it

  • 66.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $201 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 191.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.7 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M375

2015

Why buy it

  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 340 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 203% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 9.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 340 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 66.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M375 instead at 998 vs 960, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 340 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 340 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $201 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 191.5% (9.7 vs 3.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R7 340 vs Radeon R9 M375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R7 340

The Radeon R7 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 960 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon R9 M375

The Radeon R9 M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 998 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 340 scores 960 and the Radeon R9 M375 reaches 998 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 340 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M375 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 340) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M375). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 340) vs 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 1015 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 340Radeon R9 M375
G3D Mark Score
960
998+4%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024+60%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.997 TFLOPS+54%
1.299 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
975 MHz
1015 MHz+4%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
64+60%
40
L1 Cache
256 KB+60%
160 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 340Radeon R9 M375
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 340 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M375 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M375 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 340 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M375. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R7 340) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M375) — the Radeon R7 340 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 340Radeon R9 M375
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
64 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 340 draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M375's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 340) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M375). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon R7 340Radeon R9 M375
TDP
100W
75W-25%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
Mobile
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
9.6
13.3+39%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 340 came in at $99, while the Radeon R9 M375 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R7 340 was 67% cheaper ($201 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.7 (Radeon R7 340) vs 3.3 (Radeon R9 M375) — the Radeon R7 340 offers 193.9% better value.

FeatureRadeon R7 340Radeon R9 M375
MSRP
$99-67%
$300
Performance per Dollar
9.7+194%
3.3
Codename
Trinidad
Tropo
Release
June 18 2015
May 5 2015
Ranking
#467
#889

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.