Radeon R7 340 vs Radeon R7 M445

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 340 vs Radeon R7 M445 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 340 vs Radeon R7 M445: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 340

2015

Why buy it

✅114.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 156% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.7 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.

Radeon R7 M445

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 340 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
152.5% HIGHER MSRP
$250 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 9.7 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 340 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 114.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (960 vs 947), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 340 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 340 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $151 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 156% (9.7 vs 3.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R7 340 vs Radeon R7 M445 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 340

The Radeon R7 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 960 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon R7 M445

The Radeon R7 M445 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 920 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 340 scores 960 and the Radeon R7 M445 reaches 947 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 340 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M445 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 340) vs 320 (Radeon R7 M445). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 340) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M445). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 920 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 340	Radeon R7 M445
G3D Mark Score	960+1%	947
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024+220%	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.997 TFLOPS+239%	0.5888 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	975 MHz+6%	920 MHz
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	64+220%	20
L1 Cache	256 KB+220%	80 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 340	Radeon R7 M445
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 340 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M445. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R7 340) vs 128 KB (Radeon R7 M445) — the Radeon R7 340 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 340	Radeon R7 M445
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 340 draws 100W versus the Radeon R7 M445's 15W — a 147.8% difference. The Radeon R7 M445 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 340) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M445). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon R7 340	Radeon R7 M445
TDP	100W	15W-85%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Perf/Watt	9.6	63.1+557%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 340 came in at $99, while the Radeon R7 M445 launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R7 340 was 60.4% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.7 (Radeon R7 340) vs 3.8 (Radeon R7 M445) — the Radeon R7 340 offers 155.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M445 (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	Radeon R7 340	Radeon R7 M445
MSRP	$99-60%	$250
Performance per Dollar	9.7+155%	3.8
Codename	Trinidad	Meso
Release	June 18 2015	May 15 2016
Ranking	#467	#899

Search Radeon R7 340 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M445 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.