Radeon R7 370
VS
FirePro S10000

Radeon R7 370 vs FirePro S10000

AMD

Radeon R7 370

2015Boost: 975 MHz
VS

FirePro S10000

2012Core: 825 MHzBoost: 950 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro S10000

#117
L40
MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174
83%
#321
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
11725%
#336
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
100%
#337
Quadro FX 3450
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
99%
#338
GRID P40-24Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200
98%
#339
Quadro 4000
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30
98%
#340
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
93%
#341
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
91%
#342
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
86%
#343
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
85%
#344
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
84%
#346
GRID M10-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
83%
#347
FirePro V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170
82%
#348
Quadro FX 3800
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
82%
#350
GRID K520
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50
78%
#351
GRID P40-12Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
77%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro S10000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 370.

InsightRadeon R7 370FirePro S10000
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%)
Leading raw performance (+1.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (305mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 370 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 370 holds the technical lead. Priced at $51 (vs $500), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 868.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 370FirePro S10000
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+868.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($51)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 370 and FirePro S10000

AMD

Radeon R7 370

The Radeon R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,482 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

FirePro S10000

The FirePro S10000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,537 points. Launch price was $3,599.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 370 scores 4,482 and the FirePro S10000 reaches 4,537 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro S10000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 370) vs 4,096 (FirePro S10000). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 370) vs 3.405 TFLOPS ×2 (FirePro S10000). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 950 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 370FirePro S10000
G3D Mark Score
4,482
4,537+1%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
4096 ×2+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.997 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS ×2+71%
Boost Clock
975 MHz+3%
950 MHz
ROPs
32
32 ×2
TMUs
64
112 ×2+75%
L1 Cache
256 KB
448 KB+75%
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 370FirePro S10000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 370 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro S10000 has 4 GB. The FirePro S10000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R7 370) vs 768 KB (FirePro S10000) — the FirePro S10000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 370FirePro S10000
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 370) vs 12 (FirePro S10000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

FeatureRadeon R7 370FirePro S10000
DirectX
12
12
Max Displays
3
6+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 370) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro S10000). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon R7 370) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S10000).

FeatureRadeon R7 370FirePro S10000
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 3.2
Codecs
H.264
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 370 draws 100W versus the FirePro S10000's 375W — a 115.8% difference. The Radeon R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R7 370) vs 350W (FirePro S10000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 221mm vs 305mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon R7 370FirePro S10000
TDP
100W-73%
375W
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
221mm
305mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
44.8+270%
12.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 370 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $51, while the FirePro S10000 launched at $3599 and now averages $500. The Radeon R7 370 costs 89.8% less ($449 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.9 (Radeon R7 370) vs 9.1 (FirePro S10000) — the Radeon R7 370 offers 865.9% better value. The Radeon R7 370 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon R7 370FirePro S10000
MSRP
$149-96%
$3599
Avg Price (30d)
$51-90%
$500
Performance per Dollar
87.9+866%
9.1
Codename
Trinidad
Tahiti
Release
June 18 2015
November 12 2012
Ranking
#467
#461