Radeon R7 370 vs Quadro P1000
Radeon R7 370
Popular choices:
Quadro P1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P1000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 370.
| Insight | Radeon R7 370 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 370 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 370 holds the technical lead. Priced at $51 (vs $80), it costs 36% less, resulting in a 56.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 370 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+56.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($51) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 370 and Quadro P1000
Radeon R7 370
The Radeon R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,482 points. Launch price was $149.
Quadro P1000
The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 370 scores 4,482 and the Quadro P1000 reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro P1000 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 370) vs 640 (Quadro P1000). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 370) vs 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 1519 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,482 | 4,495 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+60% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.997 TFLOPS+28% | 1.555 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 975 MHz | 1519 MHz+56% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 370 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P1000 has 4 GB. The Quadro P1000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 370) vs 1 MB (Quadro P1000) — the Quadro P1000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 370) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P1000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 370) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P1000). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon R7 370) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P1000).
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 370 draws 100W versus the Quadro P1000's 40W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R7 370) vs 350W (Quadro P1000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 221mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 40W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 221mm | 145mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 44.8 | 112.4+151% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 370 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $51, while the Quadro P1000 launched at $0 and now averages $80. The Radeon R7 370 costs 36.3% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.9 (Radeon R7 370) vs 56.2 (Quadro P1000) — the Radeon R7 370 offers 56.4% better value. The Quadro P1000 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $51-36% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.9+56% | 56.2 |
| Codename | Trinidad | GP107 |
| Release | June 18 2015 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #467 | #466 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 370 and Quadro P1000
