
Radeon R7 370 vs Arc Graphics 140T

Radeon R7 370
Popular choices:

Arc Graphics 140T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 140T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The Arc Graphics 140T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 370 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 140T is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 370 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R7 370 | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 370 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $51 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140T, it costs 83% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 485.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 370 | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+485.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($51) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 370 and Arc Graphics 140T

Radeon R7 370
The Radeon R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,482 points. Launch price was $149.

Arc Graphics 140T
The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 370 scores 4,482 and the Arc Graphics 140T reaches 4,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Arc Graphics 140T uses Xe+. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 370) vs 8 (Arc Graphics 140T). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 2350 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,482 | 4,500 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Xe+ |
| Shading Units | 1024+12700% | 8 |
| Boost Clock | 975 MHz | 2350 MHz+141% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 370 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 140T has 0 MB. The Radeon R7 370 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 370) vs 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 370) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 370) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon R7 370) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T).
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 370 draws 100W versus the Arc Graphics 140T's 35W — a 96.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R7 370) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 140T). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 221mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 35W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 221mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 44.8 | 128.6+187% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 370 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $51, while the Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350 and now averages $300. The Radeon R7 370 costs 83% less ($249 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.9 (Radeon R7 370) vs 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) — the Radeon R7 370 offers 486% better value. The Arc Graphics 140T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-57% | $350 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $51-83% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.9+486% | 15.0 |
| Codename | Trinidad | — |
| Release | June 18 2015 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #467 | #409 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















