Radeon R7 370
VS
Arc Graphics 140T

Radeon R7 370 vs Arc Graphics 140T

AMD

Radeon R7 370

2015Boost: 975 MHz
VS
Intel

Arc Graphics 140T

2025Boost: 2350 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T

#320
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
844%
#322
765%
#323
763%
#327
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
694%
#328
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
689%
#330
Arc Graphics 140T
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
100%
#331
Radeon 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
99%
#333
GeForce 730A
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
99%
#334
GeForce GT 745A
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
97%
#335
GeForce 710A
MSRP: $35|Avg: $62
96%
#336
95%
#338
GeForce MX230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#340
RADEON HD6410D
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
94%
#341
GeForce 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
94%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
93%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Arc Graphics 140T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The Arc Graphics 140T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 370 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Arc Graphics 140T is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 370 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R7 370Arc Graphics 140T
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)
Leading raw performance (+0.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 370 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $51 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140T, it costs 83% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 485.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 370Arc Graphics 140T
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+485.9%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($51)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 370 and Arc Graphics 140T

AMD

Radeon R7 370

The Radeon R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,482 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Arc Graphics 140T

The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 370 scores 4,482 and the Arc Graphics 140T reaches 4,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Arc Graphics 140T uses Xe+. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 370) vs 8 (Arc Graphics 140T). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 2350 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 370Arc Graphics 140T
G3D Mark Score
4,482
4,500
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Xe+
Shading Units
1024+12700%
8
Boost Clock
975 MHz
2350 MHz+141%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
8 MB+1500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 370Arc Graphics 140T
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
XeSS
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 370 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 140T has 0 MB. The Radeon R7 370 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 370) vs 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 370Arc Graphics 140T
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
System
Bus Width
256-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
8 MB+1500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 370) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon R7 370Arc Graphics 140T
DirectX
12
12.2+2%
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 370) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon R7 370) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T).

FeatureRadeon R7 370Arc Graphics 140T
Encoder
VCE 2.0
Xe Media Engine
Decoder
UVD 4.2
Xe Media Engine
Codecs
H.264
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 370 draws 100W versus the Arc Graphics 140T's 35W — a 96.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R7 370) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 140T). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 221mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon R7 370Arc Graphics 140T
TDP
100W
35W-65%
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Integrated
Length
221mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
44.8
128.6+187%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 370 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $51, while the Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350 and now averages $300. The Radeon R7 370 costs 83% less ($249 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.9 (Radeon R7 370) vs 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) — the Radeon R7 370 offers 486% better value. The Arc Graphics 140T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon R7 370Arc Graphics 140T
MSRP
$149-57%
$350
Avg Price (30d)
$51-83%
$300
Performance per Dollar
87.9+486%
15.0
Codename
Trinidad
Release
June 18 2015
January 6 2025
Ranking
#467
#409