Radeon R7 M445 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 M445 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 M445 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 M445

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
79.9% HIGHER MSRP
$250 MSRPvs$139 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

2025

Why buy it

✅123.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $111 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 74.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 123.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 M445 instead at 947 vs 921, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E makes the most sense to buy today. It is $111 cheaper on MSRP at $139 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 74.9% (6.6 vs 3.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R7 M445 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 M445

The Radeon R7 M445 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 920 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 M445 scores 947 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E reaches 921 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M445 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R7 M445) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M445) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Boost clocks: 920 MHz vs 2920 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 M445	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
G3D Mark Score	947+3%	921
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Bristol Ridge
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	320	4096+1180%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5888 TFLOPS	47.84 TFLOPS+8025%
Boost Clock	920 MHz	2920 MHz+217%
ROPs	8	128+1500%
TMUs	20	256+1180%
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	8 MB+6054%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 M445	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M445 and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (Radeon R7 M445) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 M445	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	8 MB+6054%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M445 draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 300W — a 181% difference. The Radeon R7 M445 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M445) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R7 M445	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
TDP	15W-95%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	63.1+1935%	3.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 M445 came in at $250, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E was 44.4% cheaper ($111 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.8 (Radeon R7 M445) vs 6.6 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E offers 73.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E (2025 vs 2016).

Feature	Radeon R7 M445	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
MSRP	$250	$139-44%
Performance per Dollar	3.8	6.6+74%
Codename	Meso	Navi 48
Release	May 15 2016	July 23 2025
Ranking	#899	#23

Search Radeon R7 M445 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.