
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs Intel UHD Graphics 617

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Popular choices:

Intel UHD Graphics 617
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is positioned at rank #224 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2018). The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 617 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 and Intel UHD Graphics 617

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Intel UHD Graphics 617
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 819 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 scores 806 and the Intel UHD Graphics 617 reaches 819 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is built on Bristol Ridge while the Intel UHD Graphics 617 uses Generation 9.5, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 806 | 819+2% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+2033% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 47.84 TFLOPS+11765% | 0.4032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2920 MHz+178% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+4167% | 3 |
| TMUs | 256+967% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 617 has 0 MB. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs QuickSync.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | QuickSync |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 draws 300W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 617's 15W — a 181% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 15W-95% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.7 | 54.6+1922% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 launched at $169 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Intel UHD Graphics 617 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 costs 100+% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 617) — the Intel UHD Graphics 617 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | Navi 48 | Amber Lake GT2 |
| Release | July 23 2025 | November 7 2018 |
| Ranking | #23 | #921 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















