Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 16 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 scores 806 and the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) reaches 800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is built on Bristol Ridge while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) uses Gen. 12, both on 4 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 16 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 806 | 800 |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge | Gen. 12 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+25500% | 16 |
| Boost Clock | 2920 MHz+101% | 1450 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) carries 0 MB. Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 and System on the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H).
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs Quick Sync 8 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs Quick Sync 8.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | Quick Sync 8 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | Quick Sync 8 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 draws 300W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)'s 15W — a 181% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 15W-95% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.7 | 53.3+1874% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 came in at $169, while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) was 100+% cheaper ($169 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | Navi 48 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | July 23 2025 | March 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #23 | #917 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
