
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs Radeon R8 M445DX

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Popular choices:

Radeon R8 M445DX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is positioned at rank #224 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2016). The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R8 M445DX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R8 M445DX.
| Insight | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon R8 M445DX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R8 M445DX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $49 versus $100 for the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700, it costs 51% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 101.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon R8 M445DX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+101.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 and Radeon R8 M445DX

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Radeon R8 M445DX
The Radeon R8 M445DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 920 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 797 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 scores 806 and the Radeon R8 M445DX reaches 797 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is built on Bristol Ridge while the Radeon R8 M445DX uses GCN 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 320 (Radeon R8 M445DX). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (Radeon R8 M445DX). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 920 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon R8 M445DX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 806+1% | 797 |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+1180% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 47.84 TFLOPS+8025% | 0.5888 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2920 MHz+217% | 920 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+1500% | 8 |
| TMUs | 256+1180% | 20 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+6054% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon R8 M445DX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R8 M445DX) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon R8 M445DX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+6054% | 0.13 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 12_0 (Radeon R8 M445DX). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon R8 M445DX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R8 M445DX). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon R8 M445DX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | UVD 4.2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 draws 300W versus the Radeon R8 M445DX's 15W — a 181% difference. The Radeon R8 M445DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 350W (Radeon R8 M445DX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon R8 M445DX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 15W-95% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.7 | 53.1+1867% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 launched at $169 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon R8 M445DX launched at $0 and now averages $49. The Radeon R8 M445DX costs 51% less ($51 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 16.3 (Radeon R8 M445DX) — the Radeon R8 M445DX offers 101.2% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon R8 M445DX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $49-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1 | 16.3+101% |
| Codename | Navi 48 | Meso |
| Release | July 23 2025 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #23 | #899 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















