
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

Radeon R9 M280X
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs Radeon R9 M280X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs Radeon R9 M280X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs Radeon R9 M280X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅0.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 46.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 300W vs 200W.
Radeon R9 M280X
2013Why buy it
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 300W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌47.9% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs Radeon R9 M280X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Radeon R9 M280X
The Radeon R9 M280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 814 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 scores 806 and the Radeon R9 M280X reaches 814 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is built on Bristol Ridge while the Radeon R9 M280X uses GCN 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M280X). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M280X). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 806 | 814 |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+100% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 47.84 TFLOPS+1068% | 4.096 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2920 MHz+192% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+300% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+100% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+967% | 0.75 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M280X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M280X gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M280X. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 M280X) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+967% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 draws 300W versus the Radeon R9 M280X's 200W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R9 M280X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M280X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 200W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.7 | 4.1+52% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 came in at $169, while the Radeon R9 M280X launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 was 32.4% cheaper ($81 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 3.3 (Radeon R9 M280X) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 offers 45.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 (2025 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-32% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.8+45% | 3.3 |
| Codename | Navi 48 | Tahiti |
| Release | July 23 2025 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #23 | #404 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















