Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs Radeon R9 M280X

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M280X

2013Boost: 1000 MHz

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs Radeon R9 M280X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs Radeon R9 M280X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs Radeon R9 M280X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

2025

Why buy it

  • 0.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $81 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Delivers 46.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 50% higher power demand at 300W vs 200W.

Radeon R9 M280X

2013

Why buy it

  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 200W instead of 300W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 47.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $250 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M280X instead at 814 vs 806, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $81 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 46.5% (4.8 vs 3.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs Radeon R9 M280X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.

AMD

Radeon R9 M280X

The Radeon R9 M280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 814 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 scores 806 and the Radeon R9 M280X reaches 814 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is built on Bristol Ridge while the Radeon R9 M280X uses GCN 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M280X). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M280X). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700Radeon R9 M280X
G3D Mark Score
806
814
Architecture
Bristol Ridge
GCN 1.0
Process Node
4 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4096+100%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
47.84 TFLOPS+1068%
4.096 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2920 MHz+192%
1000 MHz
ROPs
128+300%
32
TMUs
256+100%
128
L2 Cache
8 MB+967%
0.75 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700Radeon R9 M280X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M280X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M280X gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M280X. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 M280X) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700Radeon R9 M280X
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
80 GB/s
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
8 MB+967%
0.75 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 draws 300W versus the Radeon R9 M280X's 200W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R9 M280X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M280X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700Radeon R9 M280X
TDP
300W
200W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
2.7
4.1+52%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 came in at $169, while the Radeon R9 M280X launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 was 32.4% cheaper ($81 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 3.3 (Radeon R9 M280X) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 offers 45.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 (2025 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700Radeon R9 M280X
MSRP
$169-32%
$250
Performance per Dollar
4.8+45%
3.3
Codename
Navi 48
Tahiti
Release
July 23 2025
October 8 2013
Ranking
#23
#404

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.