G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 M260DX vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 M260DX vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 M260DX

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 300W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
77.5% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

2025

Why buy it

✅111.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 75.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌300% higher power demand at 300W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 111.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 M260DX instead at 817 vs 806, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $131 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 75.1% (4.8 vs 2.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R7 M260DX vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 M260DX

The Radeon R7 M260DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 817 points.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 M260DX scores 817 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 reaches 806 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M260DX is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 uses Bristol Ridge, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Boost clocks: 715 MHz vs 2920 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 M260DX	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
G3D Mark Score	817+1%	806
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Bristol Ridge
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	384	4096+967%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5491 TFLOPS	47.84 TFLOPS+8612%
Boost Clock	715 MHz	2920 MHz+308%
ROPs	8	128+1500%
TMUs	24	256+967%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 M260DX	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260DX and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 M260DX	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 12 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

Feature	Radeon R7 M260DX	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
DirectX	12_0	12
Max Displays	0	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.0.

Feature	Radeon R7 M260DX	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Encoder	VCE 2.0	VCE 3.0
Decoder	UVD 4.2	UVD 6.0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M260DX draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700's 300W — a 120% difference. The Radeon R7 M260DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Radeon R7 M260DX	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
TDP	75W-75%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	1mm
Slots	0	0
Perf/Watt	10.9+304%	2.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 M260DX came in at $300, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 launched at $169. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 was 43.7% cheaper ($131 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 4.8 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 offers 77.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 (2025 vs 2015).

Feature	Radeon R7 M260DX	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
MSRP	$300	$169-44%
Performance per Dollar	2.7	4.8+78%
Codename	Opal	Navi 48
Release	December 6 2015	July 23 2025
Ranking	#878	#23

Search Radeon R7 M260DX on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.