Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is positioned at rank #224 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

93%

#96

L4

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

91%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

88%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

88%

#99

Tesla M40

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099

86%

#100

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499

79%

#101

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

MSRP: $11605|Avg: $8199

76%

#209

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

3097%

#224

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

MSRP: $169|Avg: $100

100%

#226

FirePro D500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

95%

#227

FirePro 3D V4800

MSRP: $189|Avg: $20

95%

#231

GRID T4-2Q

MSRP: $845|Avg: $600

91%

#238

FirePro 3D V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

77%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 876.3% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700.

Insight	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-876.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+876.3%)
Longevity	RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $100 for the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1201.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1201.7%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 and GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 scores 806 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 876.3%. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is built on Bristol Ridge while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	806	7,869+876%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge	Turing
Process Node	4 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	4096+357%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	47.84 TFLOPS+1503%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2920 MHz+75%	1665 MHz
ROPs	128+300%	32
TMUs	256+357%	56
L2 Cache	8 MB+700%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	8 MB+700%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12	12
Max Displays	0	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs NVDEC 4th gen.

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	VCE 3.0	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	UVD 6.0	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 draws 300W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 1mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	300W	75W-75%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	1mm	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	2.7	104.9+3785%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 launched at $169 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 25% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1195.1% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).