Radeon R9 280X
VS
GRID P40-4Q

Radeon R9 280X vs GRID P40-4Q

AMD

Radeon R9 280X

2013Boost: 1000 MHz
VS

GRID P40-4Q

2013Core: 745 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-4Q

#114
Quadro GP100
MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335
99%
#115
Radeon Instinct MI60
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600
98%
#279
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
7461%
#294
GRID P40-4Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
100%
#295
RTXA5000-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
99%
#297
GRID P6-2Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
99%
#299
GRID K220Q
MSRP: $469|Avg: $40
98%
#301
FirePro W9100
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200
98%
#302
GRID T4-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000
96%
#303
FirePro 3D V3700
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
91%
#304
GRID T4-1Q
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $600
89%
#305
GRID M60-2Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
87%
#306
NVS 310
MSRP: $159|Avg: $10
87%
#308
FirePro 3D V3750
MSRP: $199|Avg: $25
86%
#309
NVS 810
MSRP: $700|Avg: $80
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 280X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID P40-4Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R9 280XGRID P40-4Q
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+33.3%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 280X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 280X holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $150), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 157.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 280XGRID P40-4Q
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+157.3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($60)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 280X and GRID P40-4Q

AMD

Radeon R9 280X

The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-4Q

The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 280X scores 6,100 and the GRID P40-4Q reaches 5,926 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID P40-4Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280X) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q).

FeatureRadeon R9 280XGRID P40-4Q
G3D Mark Score
6,100+3%
5,926
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048+33%
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.096 TFLOPS+79%
2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128
128
L1 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 280XGRID P40-4Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 280X comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P40-4Q has 4 GB. The GRID P40-4Q offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon R9 280X) vs 512 KB (GRID P40-4Q) — the Radeon R9 280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 280XGRID P40-4Q
VRAM Capacity
3 GB
4 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
384-bit+200%
128-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 280X) vs 12_1 (GRID P40-4Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon R9 280XGRID P40-4Q
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12_1
Max Displays
3
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 280X draws 200W versus the GRID P40-4Q's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The Radeon R9 280X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 280X) vs 350W (GRID P40-4Q). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R9 280XGRID P40-4Q
TDP
200W-11%
225W
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
30.5+16%
26.3
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 280X launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the GRID P40-4Q launched at $3000 and now averages $150. The Radeon R9 280X costs 60% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 101.7 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 39.5 (GRID P40-4Q) — the Radeon R9 280X offers 157.5% better value.

FeatureRadeon R9 280XGRID P40-4Q
MSRP
$299-90%
$3000
Avg Price (30d)
$60-60%
$150
Performance per Dollar
101.7+157%
39.5
Codename
Tahiti
GK104
Release
October 8 2013
June 28 2013
Ranking
#404
#628