
Radeon R9 280X
Popular choices:

GRID P40-4Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-4Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 280X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID P40-4Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 280X | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 280X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 280X holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $150), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 157.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 280X | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+157.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 280X and GRID P40-4Q

Radeon R9 280X
The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.

GRID P40-4Q
The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 280X scores 6,100 and the GRID P40-4Q reaches 5,926 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID P40-4Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280X) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q).
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,100+3% | 5,926 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS+79% | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 280X comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P40-4Q has 4 GB. The GRID P40-4Q offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon R9 280X) vs 512 KB (GRID P40-4Q) — the Radeon R9 280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 280X) vs 12_1 (GRID P40-4Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 280X draws 200W versus the GRID P40-4Q's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The Radeon R9 280X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 280X) vs 350W (GRID P40-4Q). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-11% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 30.5+16% | 26.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 280X launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the GRID P40-4Q launched at $3000 and now averages $150. The Radeon R9 280X costs 60% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 101.7 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 39.5 (GRID P40-4Q) — the Radeon R9 280X offers 157.5% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-90% | $3000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-60% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 101.7+157% | 39.5 |
| Codename | Tahiti | GK104 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #404 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















