CPU
GPU
Radeon R9 280X
Popular choices:
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 280X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 280X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (3 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS.
| Insight | Radeon R9 280X | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | Legacy (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 280X remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 280X and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X
The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 280X scores 6,100 and the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,100+2% | 6,000 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1250 MHz+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 280X comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has 0 MB. The Radeon R9 280X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Radeon R9 280X) vs 135 GB/s (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) — a 113.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 280X. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+113% | 135 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 280X draws 200W versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS's 30W — a 147.8% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 280X) vs 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 30W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | Integrated |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 30.5 | 200.0+556% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 280X launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS costs 100+% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 101.7 (Radeon R9 280X) vs Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS offers Infinity% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 101.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | Tahiti | — |
| Release | October 8 2013 | October 26 2023 |
| Ranking | #404 | #459 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 280X and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
