Radeon R9 285 / 380 vs FirePro D300

Radeon R9 285 / 380

2014Core: 918 MHz

FirePro D300

2014Core: 850 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon R9 285 / 380

190

5,550

0.0%

5,722

+3.1%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro D300

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

95%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

90%

#115

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1291%

#130

FirePro D300

MSRP: $500|Avg: $20

100%

#131

Radeon Pro WX 3200

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

97%

#132

Radeon Pro WX 5100

MSRP: $499|Avg: $120

96%

#134

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

94%

#135

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

93%

#136

Quadro P3000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

93%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

87%

#140

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

87%

#141

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

86%

#142

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

86%

#143

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

86%

#144

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

84%

#145

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro D300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 285 / 380.

Insight	Radeon R9 285 / 380	FirePro D300
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro D300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro D300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $199), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 925.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R9 285 / 380	FirePro D300
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+925.8%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199)	✅More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R9 285 / 380 Benchmark Check

FirePro D300 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 285 / 380 and FirePro D300

Radeon R9 285 / 380

The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.

FirePro D300

The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 285 / 380 scores 5,550 and the FirePro D300 reaches 5,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is built on GCN 3.0 while the FirePro D300 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 1,280 (FirePro D300). Raw compute: 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300).

Feature	Radeon R9 285 / 380	FirePro D300
G3D Mark Score	5,550	5,722+3%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1792+40%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.29 TFLOPS+51%	2.176 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	112+40%	80
L1 Cache	448 KB+40%	320 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 285 / 380	FirePro D300
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 285 / 380 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro D300 has 4 GB. The FirePro D300 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon R9 285 / 380	FirePro D300
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 12 (FirePro D300). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Radeon R9 285 / 380	FirePro D300
DirectX	12	12
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro D300). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro D300).

Feature	Radeon R9 285 / 380	FirePro D300
Encoder	VCE 3.0	VCE 1.0
Decoder	UVD 5.0	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 285 / 380 draws 190W versus the FirePro D300's 150W — a 23.5% difference. The FirePro D300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 350W (FirePro D300). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 221mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Radeon R9 285 / 380	FirePro D300
TDP	190W	150W-21%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	221mm	242mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	29.2	38.1+30%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the FirePro D300 launched at $500 and now averages $20. The FirePro D300 costs 89.9% less ($179 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 286.1 (FirePro D300) — the FirePro D300 offers 925.4% better value.

Feature	Radeon R9 285 / 380	FirePro D300
MSRP	$199-60%	$500
Avg Price (30d)	$199	$20-90%
Performance per Dollar	27.9	286.1+925%
Codename	Tonga	Pitcairn
Release	September 2 2014	January 18 2014
Ranking	#365	#506