Radeon R9 285 / 380
VS
GRID M60-8A

Radeon R9 285 / 380 vs GRID M60-8A

AMD

Radeon R9 285 / 380

2014Core: 918 MHz
VS

GRID M60-8A

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-8A

#110
Quadro GV100
MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999
95%
#111
Tesla P40
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150
94%
#112
GRID RTX6000-1Q
MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500
90%
#113
Quadro RTX 8000
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999
90%
#264
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
6685%
#279
GRID P6-4Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
100%
#280
GRID M60-8A
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
100%
#282
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
97%
#284
GRID P4-2Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235
95%
#286
Tesla C2070
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $38
94%
#288
Quadro 2000 D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
94%
#289
FirePro V5900
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
93%
#290
FirePro S9000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156
91%
#293
GRID P40-4Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
90%
#294
RTXA5000-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID M60-8A offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R9 285 / 380GRID M60-8A
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GRID M60-8A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID M60-8A holds the technical lead. Priced at $120 (vs $199), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 65% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 285 / 380GRID M60-8A
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+65%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199)
More affordable ($120)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 285 / 380 and GRID M60-8A

AMD

Radeon R9 285 / 380

The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-8A

The GRID M60-8A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,523 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 285 / 380 scores 5,550 and the GRID M60-8A reaches 5,523 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GRID M60-8A uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-8A). Raw compute: 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-8A).

FeatureRadeon R9 285 / 380GRID M60-8A
G3D Mark Score
5,550
5,523
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1792
2048+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.29 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+47%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
112
128+14%
L1 Cache
448 KB
768 KB+71%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 285 / 380GRID M60-8A
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 285 / 380 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-8A has 4 GB. The GRID M60-8A offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-8A) — the GRID M60-8A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 285 / 380GRID M60-8A
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 12_1 (GRID M60-8A). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon R9 285 / 380GRID M60-8A
DirectX
12
12_1
Max Displays
4
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 285 / 380 draws 190W versus the GRID M60-8A's 225W — a 16.9% difference. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 350W (GRID M60-8A). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 221mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon R9 285 / 380GRID M60-8A
TDP
190W-16%
225W
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
221mm
1mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Perf/Watt
29.2+19%
24.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the GRID M60-8A launched at $2500 and now averages $120. The GRID M60-8A costs 39.7% less ($79 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 46.0 (GRID M60-8A) — the GRID M60-8A offers 64.9% better value. The GRID M60-8A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R9 285 / 380GRID M60-8A
MSRP
$199-92%
$2500
Avg Price (30d)
$199
$120-40%
Performance per Dollar
27.9
46.0+65%
Codename
Tonga
GM204
Release
September 2 2014
August 30 2015
Ranking
#365
#505