
Radeon R9 285 / 380 vs Radeon PRO W6300

Radeon R9 285 / 380
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon PRO W6300 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The Radeon PRO W6300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 285 / 380.
| Insight | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon PRO W6300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $199 for the Radeon R9 285 / 380, it costs 25% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 32.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+32.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 285 / 380 and Radeon PRO W6300

Radeon R9 285 / 380
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon PRO W6300
The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 scores 5,550 and the Radeon PRO W6300 reaches 5,560 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon PRO W6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6300). Raw compute: 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300).
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,550 | 5,560 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+133% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.29 TFLOPS+5% | 3.133 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+133% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+75% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) — the Radeon PRO W6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 draws 190W versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 25W — a 153.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 350W (Radeon PRO W6300). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 25W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 221mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 29.2 | 222.4+662% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200 and now averages $150. The Radeon PRO W6300 costs 24.6% less ($49 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 37.1 (Radeon PRO W6300) — the Radeon PRO W6300 offers 33% better value. The Radeon PRO W6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199 | $150-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.9 | 37.1+33% |
| Codename | Tonga | Navi 24 |
| Release | September 2 2014 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #365 | #413 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















