Radeon R9 285 / 380 vs GeForce MX570
Radeon R9 285 / 380
Popular choices:
GeForce MX570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce MX570 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The GeForce MX570 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 285 / 380.
| Insight | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce MX570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $199 for the Radeon R9 285 / 380, it costs 40% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 71.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+71.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 285 / 380 and GeForce MX570
Radeon R9 285 / 380
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.
GeForce MX570
The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 scores 5,550 and the GeForce MX570 reaches 5,738 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce MX570 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 2,048 (GeForce MX570). Raw compute: 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570).
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,550 | 5,738+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.29 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS+44% |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.44 MB | 2 MB+355% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX570 has 4 GB. The GeForce MX570 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570) — a 83.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 285 / 380. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 2 MB (GeForce MX570) — the GeForce MX570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 176 GB/s+83% | 96 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 draws 190W versus the GeForce MX570's 25W — a 153.5% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 350W (GeForce MX570). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 25W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 221mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 29.2 | 229.5+686% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the GeForce MX570 launched at $150 and now averages $120. The GeForce MX570 costs 39.7% less ($79 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 47.8 (GeForce MX570) — the GeForce MX570 offers 71.3% better value. The GeForce MX570 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $150-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199 | $120-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.9 | 47.8+71% |
| Codename | Tonga | GA107 |
| Release | September 2 2014 | Maio 2022 |
| Ranking | #365 | #407 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 285 / 380 and GeForce MX570
